Title
Shopping for Ecological Indices? On the Use of Incidence-Based Species Compositional Similarity Measures
11627/632711627/6327
Author
MacGregor Fors, Ian
Escobar Sarria, Federico
Escobar Ibáñez, Juan Fernando
Mesa Sierra, Natalia
Alvarado Roberto, Fredy Alexander
Rueda Hernández, Rafael
Moreno Ortega, Claudia Elizabeth
Falfán, Ina
Corro Méndez, Erick Joaquín
Pineda Arredondo, Eduardo O.
Bourg, Amandine
Aguilar López, José Luis
Abstract
"β-diversity has been under continuous debate, with a current need to better understand the way in which a new wave of measures work. We assessed the results of 12 incidence-based β-diversity indices. Our results of gradual species composition overlap between paired assemblages considering progressive differences in species richness show the following: (i) four indices (β-2, β-3, β-3.s, and βr) should be used cautiously given that results with no shared species retrieve results that could be misinterpreted; (ii) all measures conceived specifically as partitioned components of species compositional dissimilarities ought to be used as such and not as independent measures per se; (iii) the non-linear response of some indices to gradual species composition overlap should be interpreted carefully, and further analysis using their results as dependent variables should be performed cautiously; and (iv) two metrics (βsim and βsor) behave predictably and linearly to gradual species composition overlap. We encourage ecologists using measures of β-diversity to fully understand their mathematical nature and type of results under the scenario to be used in order to avoid inappropriate and misleading inferences."
Publication date
2022Publication type
articleDOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/d14050384Knowledge area
ECOLOGÍACollections
Publisher
MDPIKeywords
Beta diversityNestedness
Replacement
Richness difference
Species turnover